Step granularity selection in a software debugger

ABSTRACT

A debugger allows a programmer to select the granularity of a line step function. Using a debugger step statement, the programmer can specify line step, statement step, or automatic selection. When the user specifies line step in the debugger statement, the debugger functions in true line step mode, where a line of source code is executed for each step. When the user specifies statement step in the debugger statement, the debugger functions in statement step mode, where a statement is executed for each step. When the user specifies automatic selection in the debugger statement, the program is analyzed, and a decision regarding whether to use line step or statement step is made based on the characteristics of the program and based on user-specified selection criteria. In this manner the function of the debugger when line stepping can vary according to the programmer&#39;s needs.

BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

This disclosure generally relates to debuggers, and more specificallyrelates to stepping in debuggers.

2. Background Art

Computer systems have evolved into extremely sophisticated devices, andmay be found in many different settings. Computer systems typicallyinclude a combination of hardware, such as semiconductors and circuitboards, and software, also known as computer programs. As advances insemiconductor processing and computer architecture push the performanceof the computer hardware higher, more sophisticated computer softwarehas evolved to take advantage of the higher performance of the hardware,resulting in computer systems today that are much more powerful thanjust a few years ago.

As the sophistication and complexity of computer software increase, themore difficult the software is to debug. Debugging is the process offinding problems, or “bugs”, during the development of a computerprogram. Most modern programming environments include a debugger thatprovides tools for testing and debugging a computer program. Dbx is apopular Unix-based source-level debugger. One useful feature of dbx isthe ability to step through programs one source line at a time, or onemachine instruction at a time. An instruction step steps one machineinstruction at a time. A line step steps one source code line at a time.However, the definition of “line” within a dbx debugger can vary. Forexample, in some dbx debuggers, a line is defined to be a line in thesource code. In others a line is a statement, and there may be multiplestatements in a single line of source code. Thus, a line like a=1; b=2;results in two steps when statement level stepping is done. This can beparticularly annoying when macros with multiple statements areencountered. In C and C++, a macro is a single line. For debuggers thatdo statement stepping when line stepping is specified, the user willhave to step once for each statement in the macro. For debuggers that dotrue line stepping, the user will have to step only once to execute themacro.

At other times statement stepping may be desirable. Consider a looplike: while (some condition) foo( ); The way compilers expand whileloops, the first instructions generated are actually not in the loop. Abreakpoint used to implement a line step must be set on the very firstinstruction of the line. Because of this, when line stepping with a stepover type of operation, the debugger will stop on this line once.Another step will complete all iterations of the loop and stop on thenext line. Statement level stepping would stop on the call to foo( )eachtime through the loop when a step over operation was done. Many userswould find this preferable.

Known dbx debuggers implement line stepping as either a line step or astatement step, and always use this implementation whenever linestepping is specified. A programmer is thus stuck with theimplementation of line stepping in each particular dbx debugger. Withouta way for a programmer to specify desired line stepping modes, the userwill be unable to vary the function of the debugger according to his orher needs.

BRIEF SUMMARY

A debugger allows a programmer to select the granularity of a line stepfunction. Using a debugger step statement, the programmer can specifyline step, statement step, or automatic selection. When the userspecifies line step in the debugger statement, the debugger functions intrue line step mode, where a line of source code is executed for eachstep. When the user specifies statement step in the debugger statement,the debugger functions in statement step mode, where a statement isexecuted for each step. When the user specifies automatic selection inthe debugger statement, the program is analyzed, and a decisionregarding whether to use line step or statement step is made based onthe characteristics of the program and based on user-specified selectioncriteria. In this manner the function of the debugger when line steppingcan vary according to the programmer's needs.

The foregoing and other features and advantages will be apparent fromthe following more particular description, as illustrated in theaccompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

The disclosure will be described in conjunction with the appendeddrawings, where like designations denote like elements, and:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus that includes a granularityselection mechanism that determines an appropriate step mode for thedebugger;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram that shows one suitable implementation for theautomatic selection mechanism of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example program;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram that shows line step mode through the exampleprogram;

FIGS. 5 and 6 show statement step mode through the example program;

FIG. 7 is a database statement that allows a user to specify the stepmode is line, statement, or automatic;

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a method for setting the step mode in adebugger according to a database statement as shown in FIG. 7;

FIG. 9 is a sample table showing one suitable implementation for thestep granularity selection criteria shown in FIG. 2;

FIG. 10 is a sample instruction line table showing results of analyzinga program; and

FIGS. 11 and 12 are a flow diagram of a method for using the granularityselection criteria in FIG. 9 and the results of analyzing the program inFIG. 10 to automatically determine a step mode for a debugger.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The claims and disclosure herein provide a debugger that allows aprogrammer to select the granularity of line stepping. Using a debuggerstep statement, the programmer can specify line step, statement step, orautomatic selection. When the user specifies line step in the debuggerstatement, the debugger functions in true line step mode, where a lineof source code is executed for each step. When the user specifiesstatement step in the debugger statement, the debugger functions instatement step mode, where a statement is executed for each step. Whenthe user specifies automatic selection in the debugger statement, theprogram is analyzed, and a decision regarding whether to use line stepor statement step is made based on the characteristics of the programand based on user-specified selection criteria.

Referring to FIG. 1, a computer system 100 is one suitableimplementation of a computer system that includes a debugger with agranularity selection mechanism. Computer system 100 is an IBM eServerSystem i computer system. However, those skilled in the art willappreciate that the disclosure herein applies equally to any computersystem, regardless of whether the computer system is a complicatedmulti-user computing apparatus, a single user workstation, or anembedded control system. As shown in FIG. 1, computer system 100comprises one or more processors 110, a main memory 120, a mass storageinterface 130, a display interface 140, and a network interface 150.These system components are interconnected through the use of a systembus 160. Mass storage interface 130 is used to connect mass storagedevices, such as a direct access storage device 155, to computer system100. One specific type of direct access storage device 155 is a readableand writable CD-RW drive, which may store data to and read data from aCD-RW 195.

Main memory 120 preferably contains data 121, an operating system 122, aprogram 123, and a debugger 124. Data 121 represents any data thatserves as input to or output from any program in computer system 100.Operating system 122 is a multitasking operating system. Program 123 isany code that needs to be debugged, whether the code is a completeapplication, a module, or some subset of an application or module. Thedebugger 124 includes a step mechanism 125 that allows the user of thedebugger to step through the program 123 being debugged. The stepmechanism 125 includes a granularity selection mechanism 126 that allowsa user to specify a granularity of the step mechanism 125 in a databasestatement. The manual selection mechanism 127 sets the step mode of thestep mechanism 125 to line mode when the user specifies line mode in thedatabase statement. The manual selection mechanism 127 sets the stepmode of the step mechanism 125 to statement mode when the user specifiesstatement mode in the database statement. When the user specifiesautomatic in the database statement, the step mode is determinedautomatically by analyzing the program 123 and comparing the program toa set of defined criteria. The step mode is then automatically set bythe automatic selection mechanism 128 to either line step mode orstatement step mode, depending on the results of the analysis of theprogram and defined criteria.

Computer system 100 utilizes well known virtual addressing mechanismsthat allow the programs of computer system 100 to behave as if they onlyhave access to a large, single storage entity instead of access tomultiple, smaller storage entities such as main memory 120 and DASDdevice 155. Therefore, while data 121, operating system 122, program 123and debugger 124 are shown to reside in main memory 120, those skilledin the art will recognize that these items are not necessarily allcompletely contained in main memory 120 at the same time. It should alsobe noted that the term “memory” is used herein generically to refer tothe entire virtual memory of computer system 100, and may include thevirtual memory of other computer systems coupled to computer system 100.

Processor 110 may be constructed from one or more microprocessors and/orintegrated circuits. Processor 110 executes program instructions storedin main memory 120. Main memory 120 stores programs and data thatprocessor 110 may access. When computer system 100 starts up, processor110 initially executes the program instructions that make up operatingsystem 122. Processor 110 also executes the debugger 124.

Although computer system 100 is shown to contain only a single processorand a single system bus, those skilled in the art will appreciate that agranularity selection mechanism may be practiced using a computer systemthat has multiple processors and/or multiple buses. In addition, theinterfaces that are used preferably each include separate, fullyprogrammed microprocessors that are used to off-load compute-intensiveprocessing from processor 110. However, those skilled in the art willappreciate that these functions may be performed using I/O adapters aswell.

Display interface 140 is used to directly connect one or more displays165 to computer system 100. These displays 165, which may benon-intelligent (i.e., dumb) terminals or fully programmableworkstations, are used to provide system administrators and users theability to communicate with computer system 100. Note, however, thatwhile display interface 140 is provided to support communication withone or more displays 165, computer system 100 does not necessarilyrequire a display 165, because all needed interaction with users andother processes may occur via network interface 150.

Network interface 150 is used to connect computer system 100 to othercomputer systems or workstations 175 via network 170. Network interface150 broadly represents any suitable way to interconnect electronicdevices, regardless of whether the network 170 comprises present-dayanalog and/or digital techniques or via some networking mechanism of thefuture. Network interface 150 preferably includes a combination ofhardware and software that allow communicating on the network 170.Software in the network interface 150 preferably includes acommunication manager that manages communication with other computersystems 175 via network 170 using a suitable network protocol. Manydifferent network protocols can be used to implement a network. Theseprotocols are specialized computer programs that allow computers tocommunicate across a network. TCP/IP (Transmission ControlProtocol/Internet Protocol) is an example of a suitable network protocolthat may be used by the communication manager within the networkinterface 150.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the presentinvention may be embodied as a system, method or computer programproduct. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the formof an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment(including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or anembodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may allgenerally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.”Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of acomputer program product embodied in one or more computer readablemedium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.

Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may beutilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signalmedium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readablestorage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic,magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system,apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Morespecific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readablestorage medium would include the following: an electrical connectionhaving one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, arandom access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasableprogrammable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber,a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storagedevice, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storagemedium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a programfor use by or in connection with an instruction execution system,apparatus, or device.

A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signalwith computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, inbaseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may takeany of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to,electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. Acomputer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium thatis not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate,propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with aninstruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmittedusing any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless,wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination ofthe foregoing.

Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of thepresent invention may be written in any combination of one or moreprogramming languages, including an object oriented programming languagesuch as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional proceduralprogramming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similarprogramming languages. The program code may execute entirely on theuser's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alonesoftware package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remotecomputer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latterscenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computerthrough any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or awide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an externalcomputer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet ServiceProvider).

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer program instructions. These computer program instructions maybe provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, specialpurpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus toproduce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via theprocessor of the computer or other programmable data processingapparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified inthe flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computerreadable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable dataprocessing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readablemedium produce an article of manufacture including instructions whichimplement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer,other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to causea series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, otherprogrammable apparatus or other devices to produce a computerimplemented process such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer or other programmable apparatus provide processes forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

Referring to FIG. 2, a sample implementation for the automatic selectionmechanism 128 includes a program analyzer 210 and one or more stepgranularity selection criteria 220. The program analyzer 210 analyzesthe program being debugged, and generates results 212. The automaticselection mechanism 128 then compares the results 212 of the analysis ofthe program being debugged that is output by the program analyzer 210with the step granularity selection criteria 220, and automatically setsthe step mode to either line or statement depending on the results 212and the step granularity selection criteria 220. Note the stepgranularity selection criteria can include any suitable metric orheuristic for determining step mode of the debugger, including criteriathat are currently known as well as those developed in the future.Suitable granularity selection criteria are shown in FIG. 9 to includemultiple statements on one line, and one line loops.

Referring to FIG. 3, an example program 310 is shown to illustrate theconcepts of line step mode and statement step mode discussed herein.This example program 310 is extremely simple, and is shown for purposesof illustration. The example program 310 includes a line at 320 thatincludes three statements that initialize three variables k, j and i; aline at 330 that is a one line loop; a line at 340 that sets j to zero;and a line 350 that sets i to zero.

Line step mode through the example program 310 in FIG. 3 is shown inFIG. 4. Line 320 is processed as a line even though it contains threestatements at 410. The one line loop at 330 is processed as a line at420. The line 340 is processed as a line at 430. The line 350 isprocessed as a line at 440. The end bracket is then encountered at 450,indicating the end of the program, so the program is exited at 460.

Statement step mode through the example program 310 in FIG. 3 is shownin FIGS. 5 and 6. Note that each statement in line 320 is processedseparately, as shown at 510, 520 and 530 in FIG. 5. In addition, eachiteration of the one line loop at 330 is processed separately, as shownat 540-550 in FIGS. 5 and 6. Line 340 is processed at 560. Line 350 isprocessed as a line at 570. The end bracket is then encountered at 580,indicating the end of the program, so the program is exited at 590.

Known debuggers, such as dbx debuggers, typically pick either line stepmode or statement step mode when line stepping is selected, and do notallow changing the step granularity. This can cause problems becauseboth line step mode and statement step mode are desirable underdifferent circumstances. Thus, if a programmer is not concerned about aone line loop, and statement step mode is implemented by the dbxdebugger when line stepping is selected by the programmer, the debuggerwill step on all iterations of the loop, as shown at 540-550 in FIGS. 5and 6. This can be annoying for the programmer to have to step throughso many breakpoints that are not useful. Allowing the user to manuallyspecify step mode for line stepping, and also to specify automaticdetermination of step mode based on characteristics of the program,provides great flexibility that enhances the power of the debugger toprovide useful information to the programmer when debugging a program.

To allow a user to either manually specify a step mode, or to selectautomatic selection of a step mode according to a program'scharacteristics, a new debugger statement is needed. Such a statementfor the dbx debugger is shown in FIG. 7. The step statement in FIG. 7includes a parameter −Step that is set to either Line, Stmt (statement),or Auto. Thus, when the user specifies the step statement dbx−Step=Line, the line stepping in the debugger will be set to line stepmode. When the user specifies the step statement dbx −Step=Stmt, theline stepping in the debugger will be set to statement step mode. Whenthe user specifies the step statement dbx −Step=Auto, the line steppingin the debugger will be set to either line step mode or statement stepmode depending on the characteristics of the program determined by theprogram analyzer 210 in FIG. 2, and depending on the step granularityselection criteria 220 in FIG. 2.

Referring to FIG. 8, a method 800 for setting step mode in a debuggerbegins by reading a step statement (step 810). The step statement ispreferably specified by the programmer, but could also be generated bysoftware. When the step statement specifies manual granularity selection(step 820=YES), and if the step statement specifies line step mode (step830=YES), the step granularity is set to Line (step 840), which meansline step mode is selected for line stepping in the debugger. When thestep statement specifies manual granularity selection (step 820=YES),and if the step statement specifies statement step mode (step 830=NO),the step granularity is set to Stmt (step 850), which means statementstep mode is selected for line stepping in the debugger. When the stepstatement read in step 810 does not specify manual granularity selection(step 820=NO), this means the step statement specifies automaticgranularity selection. As a result, the program is analyzed (step 860),and the results of the analysis are compared to step granularityselection criteria (step 870). When the analyzed program and the stepgranularity selection criteria specify LINE mode (step 870=LINE), thestep granularity is set to Line (step 880), which means line step modeis selected for line stepping in the debugger. When the analyzed programand the step granularity selection criteria specify STMT mode (step870=STMT), the step granularity is set to Stmt (step 890), which meansstatement step mode is selected for line stepping in the debugger.

A detailed example is now given to illustrate some of the conceptsdiscussed above. Referring to FIG. 9, a table 900 includes data thatincludes step granularity selection criteria, such as 220 in FIG. 2. Forthis specific example, the two attributes (criteria) listed in the tableare 1) Multiple stmt on one line; and 2) one line loop. Each attributehas a corresponding “each weight” (Each Wt), and preferred step type. Wesee from the table 900 that multiple statements on line has an Each Wtof 1 and a preferred step type of Line. One line loop has an Each Wt of2 and a preferred step type of Stmt. The criteria specified in table 900are used to determine whether to automatically specify line mode or stepmode when performing line stepping in the debugger.

FIG. 10 shows a line table 1000 that includes characteristics of theprogram being debugged. Table 1000 is one suitable example of results212 that could be output by the program analyzer 210 in FIG. 2.Addresses 0x7982625 and 0x7982726 both specify multiple statements atthe statement type. In addition, address 0x7982726 also has a one lineloop (OLL) flag set to indicate this is a one line loop at this address.We can now analyze the program characteristics in table 1000 in FIG. 10with respect to the step granularity selection criteria in table 900 inFIG. 9 to determine whether the granularity selection mechanism (126 inFIG. 1) in the debugger should automatically set the step mode to linestep mode or statement step mode for line stepping in the debugger.

One suitable method for determining whether to automatically set thestep mode to line step mode or statement step mode is shown as method1100 in FIGS. 11 and 12. First, a step score is initialized to zero(step 1110). An entry in the line table is selected (step 1120). If theselection is not the start of a source line (step 1130=NO), if there aremore entries in the line table (step 1170=YES), the next entry isselected (step 1120), and method 1100 continues. If the selection is thestart of a source line (step 1130=YES), and if there are not multiplestatements on the line (step 1140=NO), and if the selection is not a oneline loop (step 1150=NO), if there are more entries in the line table(step 1170=YES), the next entry is selected (step 1120), and method 1100continues.

If there are multiple statements on the line (step 1140=YES), controltransfers to point A in FIG. 12. A statement in the entry is selected(step 1210). If the preferred step type for the statement is line (step1220=YES), add the “Each Wt” to the step score (step 1240). If thepreferred step type for the statement is stmt (step 1220=NO), subtractthe “Each Wt” from the step score (step 1230). If there are morestatements in the entry to process (step 1250=YES), method 1100 loopsback to step 1210 and continues until there are no more statements inthe entry to process (step 1250=N0). At this point, control passes topoint B in FIG. 11.

If the selected entry in the line table is a one line loop (step1150=YES), and if the preferred step type is line (step 1160=YES), addthe “Each Wt” to the step score (step 1164). If the preferred step typeis stmt (step 1160=NO), subtract the “Each Wt” from the step score (step1162). When there are more entries in the line table to process (step1170=YES), method 1100 loops back to step 1120 and continues until thereare no more entries in the line table to process (step 1170=N0). If thestep score is greater than zero (step 1180=YES), method 1100 returns“Line” (step 1184), which means the automatic selection mechanism 128 inFIG. 1 will automatically set the step mode to line step mode. If thestep score is not greater than zero (step 1180=NO), method 1100 returns“Stmt” (step 1182), which means the automatic selection mechanism 128 inFIG. 1 will automatically set the step mode to statement step mode.

The example in FIGS. 9-12 illustrate one specific way the automaticselection mechanism 128 can automatically specify a step mode based onthe characteristics of the program received from the program analyzer210 and based on specified step granularity selection criteria 220. Notethat other ways are equally within the scope of the disclosure andclaims herein. For example, the step mode could be automaticallyselected based on whether or not the programmer debugging the programwrote the program. Thus, if the program was written by the programmerdebugging the program, the step mode could be automatically set tostatement step mode, but if the program was written by someone else, thestep mode could be automatically set to line step mode. The disclosureand claims herein expressly extend to any suitable programcharacteristics and any suitable step granularity selection criteriathat could be used to automatically set step mode of a debugger, whethercurrently known or developed in the future.

The disclosure and claims disclose a debugger that includes agranularity selection mechanism that allows a programmer to specify viaa step statement a manual selection of step mode, or to specifyautomatic selection of step mode based on characteristics of the programand based on one or more step granularity selection criteria. When theprogrammer specifies a step statement with manual selection of line stepmode, the debugger selects line step mode for line stepping. When theprogrammer specifies a step statement with manual selection of statementstep mode, the debugger selects statement step mode for line stepping.When the programmer specifies a step statement with automatic selectionof step mode, the program is analyzed and the results of the analysisare compared to one or more step granularity selection criteria. Thegranularity selection mechanism will then automatically select eitherline step mode or statement step mode depending on the characteristicsof the program and the step granularity selection criteria. By allowinga programmer to manually specify step mode for line stepping, or tospecify automatic selection of step mode based on some defined criteria,the power and flexibility of a debugger is greatly enhanced.

One skilled in the art will appreciate that many variations are possiblewithin the scope of the claims. Thus, while the disclosure isparticularly shown and described above, it will be understood by thoseskilled in the art that these and other changes in form and details maybe made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of theclaims.

1. An apparatus comprising: at least one processor; a memory coupled tothe at least one processor; a program residing in the memory; a debuggerresiding in the memory and executed by the at least one processor, thedebugger debugging the program, the debugger comprising: a stepmechanism for stepping through the program while debugging the program,the step mechanism comprising a granularity selection mechanism thatallows a user to specify line step mode, statement step mode, andautomatic selection of step mode according to at least one selectioncriterion.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the automatic selectionof step mode comprises automatic selection of one of line step mode andstatement step mode.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the granularityselection mechanism receives a statement from the user that specifiesmanual selection of line step mode.
 4. The apparatus of claim 1 whereinthe granularity selection mechanism receives a statement from the userthat specifies manual selection of statement step mode.
 5. The apparatusof claim 1 wherein the granularity selection mechanism receives astatement from the user that specifies automatic selection of one ofline step mode and statement step mode according to an analysis of theprogram that determines whether the program satisfies the at least oneselection criterion.
 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the at leastone selection criterion specifies at least one characteristic of theprogram and specifies line step mode when the at least onecharacteristic of the program satisfies the at least one selectioncriterion, and specifies statement step mode when the at least onecharacteristic of the program does not satisfy the at least oneselection criterion.
 7. A computer-implemented method for a user todebug a program with a debugger, the method comprising the steps of:providing at least one processor; providing a memory coupled to the atleast one processor; providing the program in the memory; providing thedebugger in the memory; the at least one processor performing the stepsof: reading a step statement from a user; when the step statementspecifies manual granularity selection, and when the step statementspecifies line stepping, setting step mode of the debugger to line stepmode; when the step statement specifies manual granularity selection,and when the step statement specifies statement stepping, setting thestep mode of the debugger to statement step mode; and when the stepstatement specifies automatic granularity selection, performingautomatic selection of step mode of the debugger according to at leastone selection criterion.
 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the automaticselection of step mode comprises automatic selection of one of line stepmode and statement step mode.
 9. The method of claim 7 wherein when thestep statement specifies automatic granularity selection, performing thestep of automatic selection of one of line step mode and statement stepmode according to an analysis of the program that determines whether theprogram satisfies the at least one selection criterion.
 10. The methodof claim 9 wherein the at least one selection criterion specifies atleast one characteristic of the program and specifies line step modewhen the at least one characteristic of the program satisfies the atleast one selection criterion, and specifies statement step mode whenthe at least one characteristic of the program does not satisfy the atleast one selection criterion.
 11. A computer-implemented method for auser to debug a program with a debugger, the method comprising the stepsof: providing at least one processor; providing a memory coupled to theat least one processor; providing the program in the memory; providingthe debugger in the memory; the at least one processor performing thesteps of: reading a step statement from a user; when the step statementspecifies manual granularity selection, and when the step statementspecifies line stepping, setting the step mode of the debugger to linestep mode; when the step statement specifies manual granularityselection, and when the step statement specifies statement stepping,setting step mode of the debugger to statement step mode; and when thestep statement specifies automatic granularity selection, performingautomatic selection of one of line step mode and statement step modeaccording to an analysis of the program that determines whether theprogram satisfies at least one selection criterion, wherein the at leastone selection criterion specifies at least one characteristic of theprogram and specifies line step mode when the at least onecharacteristic of the program satisfies the at least one selectioncriterion, and specifies statement step mode when the at least onecharacteristic of the program does not satisfy the at least oneselection criterion, wherein the characteristics of the program includemultiple statements on one line and one line loops, wherein the at leastone selection criterion comprises a step score that is initialized tozero and is incremented and decremented according to the characteristicsof the program as the program is analyzed by the debugger, wherein linestep mode is automatically selected when the step score is greater thanzero and statement step mode is automatically selected when the stepscore is not greater than zero.
 12. An article of manufacture comprisingsoftware stored on a tangible storage medium, the software comprising: astep mechanism for a debugger to step through a program while debuggingthe program, the step mechanism comprising a granularity selectionmechanism that allows a user to specify line step mode, statement stepmode, and automatic selection of step mode according to at least oneselection criterion.
 13. The article of manufacture of claim 12 whereinthe automatic selection of step mode comprises automatic selection ofone of line step mode and statement step mode.
 14. The article ofmanufacture of claim 12 wherein the granularity selection mechanismreceives a statement from the user that specifies manual selection ofline step mode.
 15. The article of manufacture of claim 12 wherein thegranularity selection mechanism receives a statement from the user thatspecifies manual selection of statement step mode.
 16. The article ofmanufacture of claim 12 wherein the granularity selection mechanismreceives a statement from the user that specifies automatic selection ofone of line step mode and statement step mode according to an analysisof the program that determines whether the program satisfies the atleast one selection criterion.
 17. The article of manufacture of claim16 wherein the at least one selection criterion specifies at least onecharacteristic of the program and specifies line step mode when the atleast one characteristic of the program satisfies the at least oneselection criterion, and specifies statement step mode when the at leastone characteristic of the program does not satisfy the at least oneselection criterion.